Subject: [citizensoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica_news] Pt 1/"the State", "administrative state" -Tyranny

         I have a set of books of all of the Constitutions of the several States and other States, charters from the beginning to 1878 donated by Maxine, being that both of us prize such books and want them to continue into existence and the information to be read by interested people.  It is absolutely amazing to see the change in the constitutions pre-civil war to the change after the civil war by the reconstructions acts.  I do believe we are finally getting a handle on the what the Civil War Congress accomplished by the reconstructions acts and can now provide evidence of same.

        Prior to the civil war in Virginia (1850 Constitution), the citizen of the commonwealth could vote, but after the civil war in the new reconstructed constitution (1870 Constitution), only a  citizen of the United States that was registered was able vote.

        Prior to the civil war in Virginia (1850) the taxing power was vested in the legislature [assembly], but after the civil war (1870) the taxing was in the State, county, or corporate bodies.   We are working on getting all 2000 pages scanned and on the internet as these books are absolutely very damning.  Ho

        I have  included the key to what Congress did after the civil war to overthrow the lawful government of the United States.  Read the Bill of Rights in the attached pdf of the Constitution of Virginia 1870 - section 3.  "That the Constitution of the United States, and the laws of Congress passed in pursuant thereof, constitution the supreme law of the land, to which paramount allegiance and obedience are due from every citizen, anything in the constitution, ordinances, or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.  Section 2 is also against what three of the original States did when they entered the Union, by reserving the right to secede.

         Now you compare that statement to Article VI of the Constitution of the United States, to wit:

        "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land: ..."

         So now we have evidence of the Civil War Congress under martial law of the Reconstruction Acts, not under the authority of the United States or under the Laws of the United States reconstructing the several States or southern Confederate States into the "other States [Alaska statehood act]}, i.e. territorial States [Article IV of the Constitution of the United States] i.e. administrative states so Congress can provide for by and through the "agencies" the needful rules and regulations [Article IV]. 

         Now this laws of the Congress just happens to be in the 1959 Statehood act of Alaska also.  It would seem the reconstruction acts are still alive and well.

         Congress has plenary power in the Article I type delegations and Article IV in the territories as long as they stay within the Constitution.

         This now makes perfect logical sense, Congress usurped their limited Constitutional grant of Power, but to make it appear as though they reside in the Constitution, they first would be mandated to have the Constitution of the United States as the supreme law of the Land and then need Article IV territorial Power of Congress to "reconstruct" the several States [southern Confederate States] under martial law into a territorial State [explains why the territorial laws sit under the State Statues in a lot of the statues] that is currently been perfected into the "Administrative State" run by agencies created by the Civil War Congress under the laws of Congress with needful rules and regulations of Article IV, with all of this under the laws of Congress.  Slick!

         I did some preliminary searches in the USCA and the areas where you see in the laws of Congress are in the territorial stuff, admiralty, interstate commerce, patents, immigration, etc, which is just fine, but to create this plenary power (sic) in the [several] States is totally unconstitutional and an act of Treason.  I have been looking for a way to invoke  Treason, as Congress is aiding the northern United States of the Civil War that declared War on the people of the South, i.e. the southern several States [Confederate States], then  Congress was and is committing Treason by aiding and abetting the enemy [civil war northern United States} overthrow the lawful government of the United States by legislation as a National Legislature for "citizens of the United States" with laws of Congress.

         So what Civil War Congress did was to create under the Reconstruction Acts, which by the way make no statement of coming in the Union [reconstructed Union] on an equal footing with the "original States" [NW Ordinance of 1789 and mandatory], these "other States" [statehood act of Alaska] as though they are territories, i.e. territorial States.  Now the term "administrative state" didn't really get going in the open until the New Deal got started, but all of the States were moved under by force of arms  or by other means after the civil war under the laws of Congress - even the Northern States.  When you check the supreme court cases on the reconstruction acts, several of the states fought furiously to the Supreme Court of the United States concerning reconstruction acts, but to no avail.  Several of the  state Constitutions after the civil war were openly changed by Congress after the people has voted them in, which is conclusive evidence of the laws of Congress sitting superior to the Constitutions of the several States [in reality territorial States], because only the people of the several States can lawful change its  state Constitution, which is not truth of a territorial State.  They did this same trick in Alaska also, as I recall after it was voted on by the "citizens of the United States."

         So now the 14th Amendment makes more sense to me now.  Citizens of the United States and of the State where they reside should read citizens of the United States having only national citizenship and no Constitution with a limited delegation or grant of Power from the people [us] and residing in a territorial State, i.e. administrative state are under the laws of Congress to do with us as you want until we get our brains engaged and take our Republic back.  See the bottom of the 14th amendment [and other amendments] and there is no limit to Congress's power to legislate over "citizens of the United States" in the territorial State, i.e administrative state.

        I have also included an article from "The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States" of 1992 ISBN 0-19-505835-6 which is copyrighted material on the "Administrative State." [have to send in two parts because of size]  This is enough to make any thinking free man or woman want to fight if you have a minimum understanding of the law.  Included in this is some of the following, to wit:

"administrative agencies exercise all three constitutional powers in one entity."  No lawful Republic could do this!  An unbelievable violation of separation of powers. 

"It is not clear from the Constitution that this transference of governmental power to the agencies is constitutional."

"While acknowledging that Congress could not delegate legislative power to the president, the Court nonetheless upheld the statute."

   "Clearly, the Court had gone beyond Field v. Clark  to authorize wholesale lawmaking by the executive branch."

  "In light of the post-New Deal cases, some have suggested that there are virtually no judicially enforceable limits on the transfers of lawmaking power to administrative agencies."

  ". . . control of the agencies had now become the business of a life-tenured unelected Court."

"The Court has largely left unexamined the constitutionality of precluding judicial review of claims that the agency has acted unconstitutionally, primarily because the issue has never been squarely presented."

Ralph