David Hinkson Challenges U.S. Prosecutor's Authority

David Hinkson went on to talk about a personal issue of his where the government has been trying to bring legal action against him for awhile now. He didn't specify the underlying reasons behind their actions, although he talked about his most recent dealings with someone seeking to prosecute him. Mr. Hinkson served Nancy Cook, the U.S. Prosecutor in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, with a letter demanding to see a copy of her delegation of authority order. He also asked pursuant to the nature and the cause of the case that she provides him with a copy of an information affidavit showing that he had committed a crime. Mr. Hinkson said they have already held ten "Star Chamber" grand jury summonses against him, which were the same type of summonses held against Al Capone; they still don't have a crime.

Along with his letter, he sent 1000 Supreme Court rulings that say she is supposed to have a delegation of authority order. Mr. Hinkson said if she doesn't have one, then that means she is not an officer of the United States. If she is not an officer of the United States, then that means she is impersonating a U.S. Officer, which is illegal. The first two paragraphs of Mr. Hinkson's letter asked for her delegation of authority and the next thirteen pages listed all the Supreme Court rulings. The last two paragraphs notified her that if she failed to respond within fifteen days, then he would assume that she is impersonating a U.S. Agent. If that's the case, then she is conducting "star chamber" grand jury tribunals in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Mr. Hinkson said the fifteen days of his notice started three days ago, so around the 15th of December he can report what her response is.

Question #1: Mr. Hinkson, where are you looking to get that delegation of authority from if there is no person to issue it?
Answer #1: They can't have it. That's their problem; I didn't create this phoney house of cards for them. If they were to issue a delegation of authority order, it would violate the Tenth Amendment because the Constitution never authorized the creation of enforcement officers. The government is banned by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments from doing it. That's why Roosevelt's wife created all those federal agencies years ago. I'm sure that if they could have legally created the Food and Drug Administration and all the other alphabet soup agencies they would have, but they didn't.

Question #2: When challenging someone's delegation of authority where might that be applicable?
Answer #2: It covers state agents and judges as well. A judge has no delegation of authority either because he is not an Article III judge, therefore he will not have one. If you ask for it and he fails to provide it, then you can file a lawsuit against that judge immediately for impersonating a judge.

Question #3: Do you have to have an issue in front of a judge in order to demand his or her delegation of authority order?
Answer #3: It's found under the guarantee of the right to know the nature and cause of a case, which is called a bill of particulars.

Question #4: That’s understood, but let’s says that I just wanted to challenge all the judges in the State of Tennessee?
Answer #4: Oh, you could send them letters asking to see copies of their delegation of authority orders. I can e-mail a copy of that letter I sent that contains all of those Supreme Court rulings that I sent to that U.S. prosecutor. Send a request to dhinkson@camasnet.com and I will e-mail you back a copy of the Nancy Cook letter.

That letter can be used with any officer or agent of any government - state or federal; none of them have it. Even FBI agents are not agents of the United States government because they do not have a delegation of authority order. Neither do any of the officers or agents of the Department of Interior, U.S. Department of Labor, IRS, ATF, etc. or state agents.

There is a reason why they don't have it; it's because they are not the government. The United States Constitution is not the same thing as the Constitution for the United States of America. The Constitution for the United States of America authorized the creation of one government, which was called the District of Columbia, Inc. It did not authorize the creation of two governments. Therefore, U.S., Inc. was never created pursuant to any legal and binding authority under the Constitution for the United States of America. It's a phony corporation that in my opinion, belongs to the Queen of England.

State agents do not have delegation of authority orders either. This is because the State of Idaho, for instance, is a sub corporation of the United States and sub corporations have no more power that the parent corporation. U.S., Inc. is the parent corporation and nowhere in the U.S. Constitution did it authorize the creation of enforcement officers. That's why Mrs. Roosevelt (the wife of former president Theodore Roosevelt) created the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation as well as a few other organizations. None of them have an agency; it's all lies, B.S. and a house of cards, nothing more. By the way the president of the United States is not really the president either; he is an imposter.

LEGAL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This document along with any attachment(s) is intended only for the individual or entity recipient that is named above. If you are not the intended recipient, as specified by the sender, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in relation to the contents of the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited, and you are commanded to destroy this document in its entirety, and notify the sender. Access to this document by any other person or entity is unauthorized. "All rights are reserved, Without Prejudice UCC 1-207"