ANTITRUST & TRADE REGULATION, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE

    DOE v. US, No. 04-10097 (9th Cir. September 02, 2004)
    Plaintiff successfully challenges the denial of his motion to quash a subpoena, in conjunction with an antitrust investigation, on grounds that plaintiff's production of the documents would have a testimonial aspect protected by the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
    To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0410097p.pdf