This is a important module in that Administrative Law is not
Law, Equity, or Admiralty. So the question becomes, by what
authority is the "Legislature of the State (Alaska)"(sic) and the
"United States Congress(not the Congress of the United States")
operating under? War Powers or Treasonous acts?
Ralph
------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Law is not Common Law, Equity, or Admiralty
Arising under the holding in the adjudged case of Bowen v. Department of Social Security et al., 127 P.2d 682, 685 (1942), administrative law is a distinct branch of law, and it is not common law, equity, or admiralty and therefore can not arise under the Constitution of the United States, to wit:
Colonel O. R. McGuire, a member of the American Bar Association's special committee on administrative *153 law, in an article published in 26 Georgetown Law Journal, 574, 589, says: '* * * administrative law is a separate and distinct branch of the law. It is not common law, equity, or admiralty law * * *.' The court has recognized the principle with respect to the industrial insurance act that controversies arising under it are controlled by "special statutory proceedings exercised in derogation of, or not according to, the course of the common law." (Italics ours.) Nafus v. Department of Labor and Industries, 142 Wash. 48, 52, 251 P. 877, 878. [Emphasis added]
This is also held in the adjudged decision of State ex rel Nielson et al. v. Lindstrom, 191 P.2d 1009, 1015 (1948).
www.jusbelli.com = homepage
two e-mail lists available from homepage
The chief enemies of republican freedom are mental sloth,
conformity, bigotry, superstition, credulity, monopoly in the market
of ideas, and utter, benighted ignorance. Adderley v. State of
Florida, 385 U.S. 39, 49 (1967) Decision by Justice Black.